As most of you know, I am planning to run for US Congress as a member of the 99% club against millionaire Pete Sessions, the current Republican Representative of the 32nd district in the state of Texas
Someone wrote to me last night and asked me if I would answer two questions: 1) How did I hope to compete with the $2 million plus that Sessions will no doubt be throwing at his race and 2) How do I answer the question that people are throwing away their votes if they vote for an Independent like me.
_____________________________________________________
1) I am not competing with Sessions for money or who can spend the most money on their campaign. I am competing with Sessions for votes, for the hearts and minds and trust of the people that I am the best choice. Pete Sessions certainly has far more money than I ever will. Think of me as the “Gandhi” underdog candidate only plumper, with more clothes and slightly more aggressive, but still in keeping with the nonviolent collaborative approach to solving the huge problems that our nation and indeed, the world, faces.
I haven’t decided yet what I will do about the issue of money or even if I will need much money beyond what I can provide myself for my campaign. I don’t believe that the system is broken. I believe that the people who run it are broken. The system works just fine as long as it is not abused on behalf of special interests. I’m hoping that I won’t need any beyond the few hundred dollars that it takes me to print out news pamphlets from time to time. Do any of us really ever read those color brochures that swamp our mailboxes during Presidential election years? I know that I don’t. But I am certain that I will never ask the people in my district for more than $5. If you think about it, that should be more than enough for any campaign and if you can’t get that, then you don’t have the support of the people. The 435 Congressional Districts all over the USA average 600,000 people. If even one third of the people in my district donated $5 to my campaign, that would be $1 million dollars.
If I got that much money for my campaign, I would take volunteers to work to create a cooperative business for my district using those donations as seed money. That would be far better advertisement for my campaign than any fancy TV ads that I could run on corporate owned media. Representatives are supposed to represent the constituents in their district–not themselves and not Wall Street corporations.
Another part of my campaign: no paid staff and no store front headquarters. My campaign will operate out of my home and peoples homes who live in my district. I want to establish new rules for running political campaigns in the USA and I plan to do it by example. I’m not reading the Washington/Wall Street manifesto on how to run a campaign. I’m blazing a new trail.
________________________________________________
IF ANYTHING, AMERICANS “THROW AWAY THEIR VOTE” BY VOTING FOR A CANDIDATE OF EITHER PARTY
2) As for the argument that Americans throw their vote away by voting for an Independent–well, that is an argument that both parties have used for years to control the people with fear and herd them into the party-run corrals. However, the election of a Democratic majority in both houses in 2006 and after three years of Obama, that fear should be removed. Most Americans now see that the only real difference these days between a Democrat and a Republican is their rhetoric. Their actions are indistinguishable.
It will be interesting in 2012 to watch the two parties try to distinguish themselves from each other. After what Obama has done, Republican candidates are going to have a hard time making their “socialist” schtick stick. After what Obama has done, Democrat candidates are going to have a hard time presenting their party as “progressive.”
_____________________________________________
Republicans and Democrats Are Twins Separated at Birth and Reunited in 1987
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) began in 1987 by the Democratic and Republican parties to establish the way that presidential election debates are run between candidates for President of the United States. The Commission is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) corporation as defined by Federal US tax laws, whose debates are sponsored by private contributions from foundations and corporations.
Yes, you read that correctly. The leadership of the Democrat and Republican parties formed a corporation whose purpose is to control the Presidential elections in the USA. Further more, it is not funded by donations from people. It is funded by Wall Street corporations. Now do you get it? Now do you understand, if you did not before, the Occupy Wall Street movement and why it is so important?
THE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS 2006 to 2009
In 2006 We elected a democratic majority in BOTH houses to end the war in Iraq and bring all the troops home no later thanDecember of 2008. And what did they do instead? They continued to rubber-stamp every single one of Bush’s unfunded requests for military appropriations. Furthermore, these “peaceniks” even voted to send 100,000 more soldiers over to Iraq. That happened in the summer of 2007 when they had barely been in office half a year. Now how would a Republican Congress been worse?
Then in 2008, we elected a Democratic President and what has he done? Afraid that Obama won’t be re-elected? I’m not. I don’t care because I don’t see any difference between his leadership and that of someone like Romney. and here are a few reasons why:
HEALTH CARE
He got a healthcare bill passed and it does help a tiny segment of those who can still afford private healthcare insurance–you can’t be ousted for pre-existing conditions and people (again people whose jobs haven’t been shipped overseas) with children in college (again those who can afford it) can keep their children on their health policies. But as for the majority? Are you kidding? It does N-O-T-H-I-N-G. In fact, if anything, it penalizes them by forcing them in (2014 or 2016) to being forced to purchase what will amount to junk insurance from a Wall Street corporation–essentially providing Wall Street with 50 million new customers.
TRADE AGREEMENTS
Obama even outdid Bill Clinton on NAFTA. Obama passed not one but three devastating trade agreements. The Korean Trade agreement alone will ship 169,000 jobs overseas and will create a trade deficit of $16 billion dollars according to the Congressional Budget Office. Now I ask you, what Republican President could have done better for Wall Street and worse for the American people?
ON THE ISSUE OF IMMIGRANTS
Don’t even get me started. . .

In his seemingly never-ending quest to morph into a member of the Republican Party, President Obama has broken all prior records of any US President for deportation of undocumented immigrants. The Obama administration set a new record for deportations, removing nearly 400,000 undocumented immigrants in the last fiscal year. The Immigration and Customs Enforcement removed 396,906 undocumented immigrants from the United States in the 2011 fiscal year, a slight increase from the previous year’s 392,826 removals.
GUANTANAMO
Bush and Cheney must be happy that Obama has kept their motel hell open for business.
BUSH TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH
Obama and a Democrat majority Congress in December of 2010 voted to extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich. Do you think that a Republican President and Republican majority Congress would have done any different? They wouldn’t. These people in Washington today are one and the same. Party means nothing other than a different style of rhetoric.
OBAMA’S CABINET AND ADVISERS?
He has a corporate stooge for Attorney General who got Chiquita Brands off the hook with a fine. If justice had been served they would be in jail today as accomplices to murder. Vilsack, his Agriculture Secretary is a total corporate shill for Monsanto, one of the worst corporations in the world. Obama chose as his “financial advisor”, Jeffrey Immelt, CEO of GE, the largest Wall Street war contractor in the world and biggest Wall Street freeloader off the American people.
I could go on and on, but this will have to suffice. Other than rhetoric, where is the difference between Obama and a Republican? Were does that distinction reside? And Obama sets the standard for the party. Ben Nelson (either one of them)–how different are they from a Republican? and they are all on the take from Wall Street whether they are Democrat or Republican.