You are browsing the archive for Arizona.

Once again on Egypt: CONNECT THE DOTS TO IMF AND U.S. CORPORATIONS

February 3, 2011 in Arizona, Corporate Greed, Poverty

What has happened in Egypt is what has happened in many Arab countries:  Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen to name three.  These people have a very similar situation to the one that we have here in the USA. Quite simply that situation is multinational corporations and a minority of wealthy investors draining their country dry by claiming the majority of the resources and assets for themselves while the rest of the country go barefoot and starve.

Egypt has posted solid economic growth numbers, particularly in the past half-decade, but that growth has failed to improve the quality of life or income of most of its 80 million citizens.  Just this morning I heard Joe Scarborough report about the “outstanding” gains in the GDP–as if GDP measures anything more than how well the upper 2% are doing in any country–including the USA. Go here to read more about the GDP and what it does NOT measure.

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations reports that  the worldwide food price index surpasses its 2008 peak which resulted in global rioting and pushed as many as 64 million people into poverty.  Egyptians on average pay 40% of their income for food.  Unemployment in their nation is estimated at 40%.

********************************************************

When the USA and European nations colonize nations like Indonesia, Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen, they do not bring democracy.  They impose a form of capitalistic serfdom on the majority of the people. This same serfdom exists and is growing in the USA.  It is managed from the top by Wall Street, the upper 2% and their Congressional patsies which include most of the 261 (almost half) of the elected officials in our Congress.

Declining wages have put housing out of reach for many workers: in every state, more than the minimum wage is required to afford a one- or two-bedroom apartment at Fair Market Rent. For example, in Miami – Dade county a family needs to work 126 hours a week at minimum wage in order to afford a moderately priced two bedroom apartment.  Think about it! 126 hours a week!  That is humanly impossible  That works out to about a 16.5 hour workday, seven days a week.  AND THAT DOES NOT EVEN COVER FOOD, UTILITIES, CLOTHING, ETC.  Two bread winners, working 7 days a week for 8 hours at minimum wage can pay the rent–but who pays for the food, the clothes, the incidentals for the children’s school such as note paper, pencils, etc.

In El Paso Texas, we have U.S. citizens today risking their lives by crossing the border daily into Mexico in order to work as slaves in maquiladoras for $65 a week.

******************************************************

HOW ECONOMIC PROSPERITY IS BROUGHT TO OTHER COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD LIKE EGYPT

First of all the International Monetary Fund (IMF) comes in and set up the rules for the new casino.  These rules are harsh and they are designed–not for the majority of the people of the nation. They are set up to favor the multinational corporations and a few of the wealthiest people in the country who are willing to sell out their people.

The IMF is run by a cartel of international financiers and it is funded by taxpayer money from the USA and other western European countries.  In the USA the funding for IMF is slipped into other bills so the citizens don’t notice.  In June of 2009 funding for the IMF was slipped into a military appropriations bill by the Obama administration.  The Bush Administration did the same sort of thing and the Clinton administration before that. So don’t get side-tracked into the propaganda that party has anything to do with it.  There is no degree of separation between a millionaire Democrat and a millionaire Republican.  To draw up such differences is to  engage in the good cop/bad cop political party game that the rich have been playing on the rest of us for 30 years–ever since Reagan came into office in 1981.

In 1991 Mubarak agreed for Egypt to undergo the IMF structural adjustment. Its principles are at the heart of economic-neo liberalism that has dominated USA Politics for 30 years beginning with Reagan.

“Structural adjustment”, the standard IMF/World Bank policy package calls for slashing government spending, nurturing privatization, and opening up countries to exploitative foreign investment.  These measures have deepened poverty around the world. In the two regions with the most structural adjustment experience, per capita income has stagnated (Latin America) or plummeted (Africa).  Structural adjustment has also contributed to wealth inequality in the developing world.

Privatization–the sell off of government-owned enterprises to private owners, often foreign investors.  Privatization is typically associated with layoff and pay cuts for workers.

Cuts in government spending–These reductions frequently reduce the services available to the poor.

Promotion of exports--Under structural adjustment programs, countries undertake a variety of measures to promote exports, at the expense of production for domestic needs. In the rural sector, the export orientation is often associated with the displacement of poor people who grow food for their own consumption, as their land is taken over.  (Look no further than Madagascar for a recent example.  This fall, their leaders signed a 99 year lease with South Korea, handing over half of all the arable land in Madagascar.)

Imposition of user fees–Many IMF and World Bank loans call for the imposition of “user fees” charges for the use of government provided services like schools, health clinics and clean drinking water. For very poor people, even modest charges may result in denial of access to services.

Higher interest rates–(like the ones that Americans pay on their credit cards) Higher interest rates exert a recessionary effect on national economies, leading to higher rates of joblessness.  Small businesses, often operated by women find it more difficult to gain access to affordable credit to survive.

Trade Liberalization — The elimination of tariff protections for industries in developing countries often leads to mass layoffs.  In Mozambique, for example, the IMF and World Bank ordered the removal of an export tax of cashew nuts.  10,000 adults, mostly women lost their jobs in cashew nut processing factories.  Most of the processing was shifted to India where child laborers shell the nuts at home.

IF YOU WANT TO SEE AN EXAMPLE OF THIS IDEOLOGY UNLEASHED ON US CITIZENS IN ITS HARSHEST FORM, LOOK NO FURTHER THAN ARIZONA.

Proclaim the Queen!

    USA Twisted Reality on WMD’s

    January 20, 2011 in Arizona

    Are we a nation of hypocrites or what!

    We’ve spent over 7 years, billions of dollars, and God knows how many human lives in  reducing a nation [Iraq] to rubble for weapons of mass destruction that they didn’t even have in the first place and yet our nation sells weapons of mass destruction every day in catalogs that are available to our general public.

    IN THE USA YOU EVEN GET YOUR WMD’S ONLINE

    Photobucket

    Proclaim the Queen!

      “Call to Arms” from Joe Manchin and the Coal Industry. Why should US Representatives and Fox News pundits get a pass on inciting violence?

      January 20, 2011 in Arizona

      Photobucket

      Are we going to have another Arizona today in West Virginia?

      Less than two weeks after the Tucson shooting tragedy, residents in central Appalachia got a “call to arms” from coal industry representatives for rally at the state capitol today in Charleston, West Virginia.  Some residents are asking for the permit for the “call to arms” to be revoked for inciting violence.

      Coal industry front group “Friends of Coal” is hailing a rally planned by Acting Governor Earl Ray Tomblin for Thursday, January 20th at the state capitol in Charleston, West Virginia as a “call to arms.”

      This is not the first time that officials from the coal industry have threatened violence against those who disagree with them. Last fall US Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) made national news for firing a rifle while invoking President Obama’s name and commitment to cap and trade policies. While shooting the gun, Manchin said he would take “dead aim.” Why was someone like Fuller, a victim of the Arizona shooting, arrested for saying that a Tea Party advocate was “dead” and Joe Manchin was not? Do Republican congressmen get a pass on inciting violence?

      Proclaim the Queen!

        Where is the justice?

        January 19, 2011 in Arizona

        Photobucket

        James Eric Fuller, a man wounded in the attack was arrested and taken for a psychiatric exam after an outburst at a town hall meeting, during which he took a picture of a tea party leader and yelled “you’re dead,” authorities say.

        James Eric Fuller, 63, was detained on misdemeanor disorderly conduct and threat charges during the event taped for a special edition of ABC’s “This Week” . He apparently became upset when Trent Humphries suggested that conversations about gun control be delayed until all the dead were buried, KGUN-TV in Tucson reported.

        In August of 2009, Glenn Beck joked about adding poison to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s glass of wine on his show on Thursday afternoon. As the Fox News host imagined what it would be like to go to a Pelosi fundraiser, a staffer sat across the table from him wearing a Pelosi mask.

        As the staffer raised a glass of red wine to her lips, Beck demanded, “Drink it. Drink it. Drink it.”

        He then added, “I wanted to thank you for having me over here in wine country… By the way, I put poison in your… No. I look forward to all the policy discussions we’re supposed to have. You know, on health care, energy reform, and the economy. Hey, is that Sean Penn over there?”

        Proclaim the Queen!

          Don’t expect any sanity on Gun Control from Texas lawmakers

          January 17, 2011 in Arizona, Uncategorized

          NOPE! NO-SIR-EE-BOB!  Don’t expect lawmakers from the state that hosted the second deadliest shooting rampage in American history to lift a finger to bring even a modicum of sanity to the table in terms of gun laws. The Luby’s massacre was a mass murder that took place on October 16, 1991, in Killeen, Texas, United States when George Jo Hennard drove his pickup truck into a Luby’s Cafeteria and shot 23 people to death while wounding another 20, subsequently committing suicide by shooting himself. It was the deadliest shooting rampage in American history until the 2007 Virginia Tech massacre.

          WEAPONS OF CHOICE USED BY THE KILLER: Glock 17 and Ruger P89

          POLITICALLY MOTIVATED? Hennard yelled “This is what Bell County has done to me!”, then opened fire on the restaurant’s patrons and staff with a Glock 17 pistol and later a Ruger P89. He stalked, shot, and killed 23 people while wounding another 20 before committing suicide. About 80 people were in the restaurant at the time.

          TEXAS MUST BE THE NATIONAL CAPITAL FOR MASS MURDERS COMMITTED BY CITIZENS OF THE USA AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE US MILITARY.

          I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that Texas ranks #1 in all the states in the Union for mass murder. We have the Luby Massacre in 1991 that claimed the lives of 23 people.  We have the 1966 University of Texas massacre by Charles Whitman (like Kennard, another ex-Marine) who killed 16 people and wounded 32 others.  Then we have the Fort Hood mass murders of November 2009. (again, another member of the US military who killed thirteen people and wounded 30  others.

          *************************************************************

          It says a lot about the appetite for gun control in Congress that only one Texan offered any gun-related initiative in the wake of the assassination attempt in Arizona that took the lives of six Americans and seriously wounded Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

          It says even more about the Texas delegation’s staunch support for the Second Amendment that the proposal by Rep. Louie Gohmert R-Tyler, would expand gun rights to permit lawmakers to carry weapons around the nation’s capital.

          “We don’t need to spend millions on massive security details to escort everyone 24/7,” said Gohmert, who has earned an “A” grade from the National Rifle Association  . “We can just allow those who have been trusted by hundreds of thousands of people and sent to our crime capital (of Washington) to protect themselves while in that federal enclave.”

          Just eight Texas representatives – all Democrats – voted for Brady restrictions in 1994. Only one of them, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Dallas, remains in Congress today.  MORE

          ********************************************************************************

          They all come back with the favorite homily (common folk “wisdom” this is actually a form of propaganda that twists the truth)

          “It’s the shooter, not the gun,” said Rep. Ted Poe

          “We need to go to the root cause of the incident,” said Rep. Gene Green, D-Houston, who has earned an “A” grade from the National Rifle Association. “It wasn’t the instrument; it was the person who did it.”

          Blue Dogs and Republicans alike are not going to stand up and do the right thing for public safety because to do so means that they might lose the votes of Second Amendment Rights fanatics and their standing with the NRA, one of the most powerful lobbies in Washington D.C. The NRA don’t represent gun enthusiasts.  They represent the manufacturers of these weapons.

          *************************************************************

          HERE IS A RETORT TO THEIR STUPID CLICHE:  “PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE, NOT GUNS.”
          Anyone of even marginal intelligence should not utter such ignorance,
          much less an elected official!

          WAR CARTOON

          Proclaim the Queen!

            Interesting dilemma regarding the shooting in Arizona

            January 17, 2011 in Arizona

            Crooks and Liars published a piece that pointed out a trend among the right and their reaction to various assassins.  ” .    .     .  Thus we have witnessed a steady stream of “isolated incidents” in which angry, mentally unstable men walk into churches and shoot their liberal targets in the head, or walk into public spaces and open fire, or crash their planes into government offices and gun down police officers. Yet when all these, and a long list of similar incidents, occur, they are dismissed as “isolated incidents.” Because, you see the perpetrators are just “nutcases.  .    .    .”

            Eventually, I suppose that we will all have to face the conclusion that all these incidents are not isolated.  I wonder how many more that it will take?  They are connected by many common threads:

            • the target killed is never a right-wing conservative
            • the assassin is “insane”
            • a gun in the possession of an insane person killed the target.  Contrary to the right-wing gun rhetoric it is the bullet fired from the gun that kills the person.  Guns do kill people regardless the clever manipulation of rhetoric by right wing pundits.

            So, what are we going to do?  Continue to allow people to be assassinated for their viewpoints because our laws make it easy for an “insane” person to get a gun, or are we going to be sensible and protect ALL citizens by making sure that those who want to buy a gun are properly screened?

            Here’s back at legislators who resort to stupid cliches such as “guns don’t kill people, people kill people”:

            In the defense of guns: Guns don’t kill people, bullets do.

            How about this as another example of taking their faulty logic to its extreme:

            “There are no gunshot victims, just people who get in the way of bullets.”  This way, not the shooter, not he gun, and not the bullet are responsible.  It’s the victim’s fault!

            This is the ultimate in right-wing thought–make it the victims fault and call it “individual responsibility”.  It’s your own damn fault if you get in the way of a killer’s bullet.  That’s the kind of brainwashed mentality that we are working with here.  If you think that you are going to win a battle with a skunk, you’ve got some lessons to learn and you better have more than one change of clothing handy.

            I’ve found that the best strategy is to avoid them as much as possible and appeal to the chickens by teaching them about the skunk’s ways.

            Proclaim the Queen!

              Gun politics, Culture, Poverty, Geography and their relationship to gun deaths

              January 16, 2011 in Arizona

              File:Annie-oakley.jpgFile:Miss-Annie-Oakley-peerless-wing-shot.jpg

              Phoebae Ann Mosey  (Annie Oakley)  Guns are woven into the stories and mythology of our nation.

              For all the attention that gun ownership gets in mainstream media, one would think that every man woman and child owns a gun in the USA, but as usual, that is media hyperbole.

              Wikipedia reports that about 25% of the adults in the United States personally own a gun, the vast majority of them men [Cook, Philip J.; Ludwig, Jens (2003). Evaluating gun policy: effects on crime and violence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. pp. s. 3, 4. ISBN 0-8157-5311-X.]

              Less than half of gun owners say that the primary reason they own a gun is for self-protection against crime, reflecting a popularity of hunting and sport-shooting among gun owners. As hunting and sport-shooting tends to favor rural areas, naturally the bulk of gun owners generally live in rural areas and small towns. [IBID]

              *************************************************************************

              QUEEN’S COMMENTS:

              PERHAPS IN ADDITION TO CIVILITY WE SHOULD ALSO ADD A GOOD DOSE OF SENSIBILITY.

              Do we have a problem with easy access of guns to the mentally ill such as Loughner?  Yes, most definitely. Does political rhetoric contribute to gun violence?  Some studies such as the one cited below suggest that it does.

              Do we live in a crazed nation where every America owns a gun?  No, not even close.  We do have more gun deaths every year than any other nation in the world, but most of these deaths are not caused by the rural folks of America who own most of the guns.

              Has the crazy gun politics of the  Tea Party and many Republicans heightened increased the chances of gun violence in the USA?  Yes, I think it has.  Yes I think that politicians like Sarah Palin should stop making “hit” list and creating cross hairs over maps where opponents to her way of thinking live.  Yes, I think that Tea Party politicians such as Jesse Kelly should stop their Dog Whistle gun politics whereby they pose in military fatigues with assault weapons. If nothing else than the simple obvious fact that it is in poor taste.

              Do I think that these politicians and their Dog Whistle Politics with its inflamed rhetoric for people to “take up arms” are the only contributors to gun violence or physical intimidation in the USA? Hell no. I would say that easily half of all the TV programming features physical violence in some form and at least a third of that is gun violence and these factors must be figured into the larger picture.  But today we are not limited to  TV as a medium.  Now we have all those violent computer games where opponents shoot one another.  As a culture, we are desensitized to violence. But there are other contributing factors such as poverty that are rarely considered and the growing number of citizens in our nation who feel like they have nothing left to lose.

              GEOGRAPHY AND POVERTY ARE OTHER FACTORS IN GUN DEATHS

              So what are the factors that are associated with firearm deaths at the state level?

              Poverty is one. The correlation between death by gun and poverty at the state level is .59.

              An economy dominated by working class jobs is another. Having a high percentage of working class jobs is closely associated with firearm deaths (.55). And, not surprisingly, firearm-related deaths are positively correlated with the rates of high school students that carry weapons on school property (.54).

              What about politics? It’s hard to quantify political rhetoric, but we can distinguish blue from red states. Taking the voting patterns from the 2008 presidential election, we found a striking pattern: Firearm-related deaths were positively associated with states that voted for McCain (.66) and negatively associated with states that voted for Obama (-.66). Though this association is likely to infuriate many people, the statistics are unmistakable. Partisan affiliations alone cannot explain them; most likely they stem from two broader, underlying factors – the economic and employment makeup of the states and their policies toward guns and gun ownership.

              Firearm deaths were far less likely to occur in states with higher levels of college graduates (-.64) and more creative class jobs (-.52).

              Gun deaths were also less likely in states with higher levels of economic development (with a correlation of -.32 to economic output) and higher levels of happiness and well-being (-.41).

              And for all the terrifying talk about violence-prone immigrants, states with more immigrants have lower levels of gun-related deaths (the correlation between the two being -.34).

              And what about gun control? As of July 29 of last year, Arizona became one of only three states that permit its citizens to carry concealed weapons without a permit. Might tighter gun control laws make a difference? Our analysis suggests that they do.

              SOURCE

              Proclaim the Queen!

                Thank you Jon for pointing out the hypocrisy in the right wing criticism of the Memorial service in Arizona

                January 15, 2011 in Arizona

                Thank you Jon Stewart for reminding the pundits on Fox News that the Memorial service was not a “show.”  Thank you.  Thank you.

                The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
                Veiled Criticism
                www.thedailyshow.com
                Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook
                Proclaim the Queen!

                  Examples of Tea Party Rhetoric OVER THE TOP

                  January 15, 2011 in Arizona, Uncategorized

                  Last summer Gabrielle Giffords’s Republican opponent Jesse Kelly encourages voters to join him in rally to oust Giffords from office by shooting a fully-loaded assault rifle:  “Get on Target for Victory in November Help remove Gabrielle Giffords from office Shoot a fully automatic M16 with Jesse Kelly the invitation read.  To promote the event, Kelly was pictured on his campaign website wearing military gear and holding an automatic weapon.

                  MORE EXAMPLES

                  1. House GOP Candidate from North Caroline holds machine gun social

                  2. GOP Candidate for State Office in South Caroline Holds machine gun social with giveaway of a $700 AK-47 semiautomatic rifle.

                  3. Republican lawmaker shoots target with Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman’s initial.  (Is it by coincidence that the victims are Jewish women?)

                  4.Tea Party Supporters bring guns to local parade in Alaska. (why?)

                  5.  Senator uses Federal Cap-and-Trade bill as shooting target.

                  6. Arizona State Senator fires automatic rifle in campaign ad ( why?)

                  7. Michele Bachmann fires assault rifle while on campaign tour.

                  ************************************************************************************

                  QUEEN’S COMMENTS

                  Jesse Kelly does not look any less deranged in the photo above than Loughner in his recent mug shots.  It may not be against the law, but in my eyes and in the eyes of some Americans, Kelly was inciting people to murder by evoking such language and imagery of violence while coupling it with the name of Gabrielle Giffords.

                  Proclaim the Queen!

                    Interesting fact about those in Arizona who took Action: The three who stopped the killing were senior citizens

                    January 15, 2011 in Arizona

                    Photobucket

                    THESE ARE THE THREE WHO TOOK THE BIGGEST CHANCE WITH THEIR LIVES TO STOP THE KILLING AND ALL ARE OVER 60 YEARS OF AGE

                    Often we read that it’s the “older” crowd who are more conservative, but that certainly hasn’t been proven to be the case in Arizona.

                    Sheriff Dupnik who spoke up and had the courage to not mince words about the political climate of bigotry and hate in Arizona is 75 years old.  Patricia Maisch, the woman who wrestled the magazine clip away from Loughner and the first responder who took the greatest risk is 61.  Bill Badger (shown on the right in the photo above) is one of the two men who tackled Loughner is 74.  The other man who tackled Loughner is Roger Salzgeber.  After these three had subdued Loughner and had him on the ground, Joseph Zamudio (age 24) sat on Loughner’s  legs and helped the other two men to keep him pinned down.

                    Proclaim the Queen!