You are browsing the archive for Social Security.

It is time for government officials to stop using Wall Street as a Model for government

October 1, 2011 in 2012 Elections, Social Security, Wall Street

And it is time for Wall Street CEOs to stop acting like they were elected by the voters

Examples Abound!

1) From Wall Street:

Jeffrey Immelt, CEO of General Electric told share holders at the December 2010 annual stockholders meeting that because the employee pension plan was such as “drag” on the corporation that they would not be extending pension plans to new employees beginning in 2011–after all, he claimed, the employee pension plans would mean that GE stock would be a whole 13 cents share lower in 2011 if they continued to offer employee pension plans to new employees.

Immelt’s statement of the connection between employee pension plans and the “drag on GE investors” is about as difficult to conceptualize as the Virgin Birth–unless of course you are willing to take some enormous leap of faith.  You see, the fact are that  GE has not contributed a cent to the workers’ pension plans for over 20 years!  Not  since 1987 and that the funds still had enough money to cover all the current and future retirees.

Someone should make Mr. Immelt explain himself–but don’t count on President Obama.  After all Jeffery Immelt is advising the President.

______________________________________________

2) From  the Millionaires in Washington D. C.:

From the Obama Administration and Millionaire Members of Congress along with many Obama Republican appointees, we hear similar dire predictions about Social Security.

Boehner and his crew are busting their balls to try to get Social Security cuts built into the negotiations for balancing the budget.  This is ludicrous–as ludicrous as if was for Jeffrey Immelt to suggest that the GE employee pension funds are a “drag on the share holders”.  The “government”  (just like GE) does not set aside a damn cent for social security.  Social Security has NOTHING to do with the national budget.  It is a program that is totally funded by workers.  Those who can be trusted tell us that Social Security can continue to fund at 100% until 2035 and after that–even if Congress did nothing, Social Security could still fund at 75% indefinitely.  To improve Social Security and perhaps increase the payouts for recipients to a living income, all Congress needs to do is to make the rich (those earning over $107,000 a year) to start paying Social Security tax on all their income–not just amounts under $107,000.

Furthermore, we have asses like Alan Simpson, one of the co-chairs of Obama’s deficit commission telling the seniors that Social Security is a cow with 250 million teats that they suckle.  And what was the President’s response?  Did he stand up for seniors?  Hell no.  He just chuckled and said something to the effect that we all know that Alan Simpson is a crusty  old man.

___________________________________________________

So what do these two groups:  the millionaires in Washington and the Millionaires on Wall Street have in common–Besides the obvious such as their personal wealth and Wall Street investments and belonging to the same clubs?

They both want to rob the piggy banks of the majority–money that WE, not they, have put there by the sweat of our brows!

Just ask Rick Perry.  He knows how to do it.  Like Jeffrey Immelt, he has already done it.  Frankly, it looks to me like Barack Obama, with his Deficit commission, has taken a page out of Perry’s playbook.  Perry has been hand selecting committees to “study” political action and the empowering them to take it for several years now.  Obama’s “deficit commission” looks a lot like some of the commissions that Perry has established over the years. For example, there is Perry’s Texas Enterprise Fund.

___________________________________________________

3) Rick Perry’s Texas Enterprise Fund

Perry took $600 million from the Texas workers unemployment fund and gave it to corporations to create jobs. Bank of America was one of the recipients.  Problem is that many of the jobs never materialized, but that didn’t stop these Wall Street corporations from forking over huge wads of cash to Perry’s campaign.

Perry’s Back-Scratching for Bank of America must have felt really good to them as they netted $13 million in hard-earned Texas taxpayer dollars even though they failed to create a single job:

In January of 2008, Burnt Orange [another great site for Texas news] reported a comment from a watchful reader of the Houston Chronicle:  ”According to a business brief on Jan. 17, “Bank of America mum on job plan,” our governor and Legislature loaned/gave California-based Countrywide Financial $20 million of taxpayer money to “create” 7,500 new jobs (about $2,700 per job) in Texas by 2010. The default provision of this loan/gift from the Governor’s Texas Enterprise Fund calls for a repayment to the state of $854 for each job not “created” by a specific date.”

Doing the math, it appears that Countrywide – or Bank of America – nets $13 million in hard-earned taxpayer dollars even if it fails to “create” a single job.

Hewlett Packard, was a recipient of $3 million from the Texas Enterprise Fund to open four data centers around Texas.  They never materialized. HP later repaid its grant, but not before contributing $20,000 to Perry’s campaign (not even near the interest they would have been charged by a bank on this loan to them by the people of the state of Texas. HP also contributed $518,767 to the RGA.

_____________________________________________________

I hope that more Americans are beginning to understand why the Americans participating in Occupy Wall Street are mad as hell at Wall Street.

Perhaps they will wake up  the majority here in the USA in time to make a clean sweep for democracy in 2012 by removing every single member from the House of Representatives and replacing them with a member of the majority.

Let’s make a clean sweep in 2012.  For more information.

Remove the entire House of Representatives from Office.  Replace them with Independents–Americans from the majority (those who earn less than $100,000 a year; who own no wall street; and don’t take a penny from Wall Street Corporations.)

Proclaim the Queen!

    Contact the White House Today! Tell Obama what you think!

    July 25, 2011 in 2012 Elections, Social Security

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

    Here is the message I just sent:

    Proclaim the Queen!

      Washington can go to hell and take both parties with it.

      July 25, 2011 in Social Security

      If this is the best that the Democrats AND the Republicans can do, then we the people must find replacements for ALL of them and we must start now!.   If Social Security and Medicare–two programs that work for the majority of Americans–are cut in any way, it is the fault of the leadership and the Congressional members of BOTH parties. KICK THEM ALL OUT IN 2012. FURTHER INSTRUCTIONS HERE. GET STARTED NOW ON FINDING REPLACEMENTS FOR ALL OF THEM!


      Proclaim the Queen!

        Another Angry Letter to the White House

        July 9, 2011 in Social Security

        Go here and write your own letter about Social Security and Medicare cuts

        http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

        Proclaim the Queen!

          Write a letter to Obama now if you care about Social Security and Medicare..

          July 7, 2011 in 2012 Elections, Social Security

          I have read in several places on the Internet this morning that Social Security, a totally funded entitlement program is on the chopping block again–and the only reason is so the millionaires can get at these funds, stuff them in Wall Street and lose them for the American people.

          It likely will have no impact but I wrote a letter to Obama all the same this morning.

          If he cuts Social Security or Medicare to pacify the rich.  He can go to hell.  I will not under any circumstances vote for him in 2012.  And my guess is that millions of other Americans will not either.  Further more I’m fed up with the excuse–”Oh but things will be so much worse.”  That is what the corporate centrists (ie Republican) Democrats have held over the heads of Americans for the past 20 years as they dispensed crumbs.  What good is a crumb is it is not sufficient to live on?  What good is a minimum wage set by millionaires in Congress if it is not a living wage?

          http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact

           

          Proclaim the Queen!

            In response to Simpson’s rude Behavior: Obama is Bud Abbott and Simpson is Lou Costello

            May 9, 2011 in Social Security

            Photobucket
            It is outrageous that Obama hasn’t yanked Simpson’s a$$ off that committee, but he hasn’t because Obama is gaming the American people.  Obama is the one who appointed Simpson to this committee.  He knew what Simpson stood for when the appointed him. Obama’s strategy is to have this outrageous buffoon rant and rave and scare the American people to the point that we will settle for whatever lame a$$ solution that Obama and his administration had in mind in the first place such as raising the age to 70 and calling it a “compromise.”

            Obama is Bud Abbott and Simpson is Lou Costello.
            But the whole “problem” with social security is the same problem as with our national debt. We are where we are today because the rich have been free-loading for the past 30 years.

            Social Security funding issues could be solved with one line of Legislation:  “All Americans will now pay Social Security tax on ALL of their income. Currently only those of us who earn less than $107,000 a year must may SS tax on 100% of our income.”

            The arrogant rich like to tell us they don’t need it.  Well, they should talk to some of Bernie Madoff and Enron’s victims.  Many of these people never thought they would need Social Security either and some of them are glad they have it.

            ******************************************************

            You would think that Obama would know better, but he plays the good ole boy game as well as the rest of them.  As William Greider pointed out back in August, “Senator Guttermouth should have been turned out to pasture years ago, but instead he was given a teaching post at Harvard [Obama's alma mater] and Barack Obama made him co-chair of the President’s bipartisan commission on reducing the federal deficits.

            How about if we take away Guttermouth’s government tit from him.  He gets a retirement benefit from the U.S. taxpayers that is about 9 times that of the Average Social security retiree and he didn’t pay a dime into it.

             

             

            Proclaim the Queen!