You are browsing the archive for Energy.

Looks like Germany is well on its way to win its anti-nuclear bet

October 22, 2011 in Energy

The farm, Germany’s largest, is located 28 miles off the east Frisian island of Borkum

Offshore Turbines More Powerful than the First Nuclear Plant

You may remember that in response to the Japanese nuclear plant disaster earlier this year, Germany permanently shut down several of its nuclear power plants and vowed to eventually close them all.

Der Spiegel reports that Germany is well on its way to achieving that goal ;

__________________________________________________________

“.  .  . Germany is the first highly developed, industrialized nation to decide to be dependent on renewable energy in the future. Germany is also the country where nuclear fission was discovered and the internal combustion engine was invented. By 2020 Germany, a country dotted with auto plants, chemical factories and steel mills, is to derive fully one fifth of its power from wind turbines.

The Bet Germany Cannot Afford to Lose

The goal, according to the proponents of wind energy, is to end Germany’s epochal dependence on petroleum, so that it will no longer be reliant on a country ruled by someone like Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. The goal is to do nothing less than change the climate system and set the agenda for the 21st century. A bigger task is hardly imaginable. Germany has made a bet that it cannot afford to lose.

And everyone is watching. If the phase-out works in Germany, and if the Germans can at least partially replace nuclear power with wind energy, it can work in Great Britain, Chile, France and California. Germany has become a test laboratory. Meanwhile, Ralf Klooster will have his hands full until his workday ends at 6:30 p.m. “Okay, let’s get going,” he says. .  .”  Read the entire article at Der Spiegel.

____________________________________________________

ILWQ:  Looks to me like soon there will be no more excuses for the USA and the UK to continue to prop up the fossil fuel industry.

Proclaim the Queen!

    LIBYA: Again, that sticky wicket of tribal power that westerners, even NATO overlook!

    May 28, 2011 in Energy

    AL ARABIYA NEWS REPORTS THAT NATO MAY BE MAKING A BLUNDER OF ICEBERG PROPORTIONS by not appealing to the tribal powerful

    NATO has introduced attack helicopters because they fly lower and slower and are able to identify targets more accurately in densely populated areas while risking fewer civilian lives.  The introduction of helicopters is risky because there is no guarantee that attack helicopters will achieve what fighter planes couldn’t. Also helicopters make NATO more vulnerable to Libyan defenses.

    But more importantly, the introduction of the helicopters fails to question the assumptions underlying the military campaign. Most of Gaddafi’s senior aides who have defected had no power base of their own. If anything, they may have strengthened Mr. Qaddafi resolve and reinforced the position of hardliners around him.

    Al Arabiya reports that the international community as well as NATO would be better advised to focus on tribes still loyal to Mr. Qaddafi rather than on individuals eager to save their skin. Many of Libya’s 140 tribes have been sitting on the sidelines waiting to see who emerges victorious from the battle between Mr. Qaddafi and his opponents.

    *****************************************************

    QUEEN’S COMMENTS

    I know the U.S. State Department is filled with intelligent people who get news updates by the hour, but I’m beginning to wonder–from what sources?  I wonder how many of our leaders understand tribal influence in the Middle East.  I think that President Obama does which is on of the reasons that he has stuck his neck out there on the Palestine/Israel issue.  But a lot of people in Washington DC including close to 100% of Congress seem to be stuck in the 1990′s if not the 1950′s in regard to their diplomacy or lack of it in the Middle East.

    ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM IFLIZWEREQUEEN

    It was ignorance of tribal influence in the Middle East that landed the USA  in Iraq and continues to keep us there. The same may be said of our problems in Afghanistan and  Pakistan as well. At the heart of all the conflicts of power in the Middle East are the tribes and the power that in many cases such as Syria, Bahrain, Yemen and even Egypt that minority tribal influences wield over the majority of the people. Any strategy that over looks this part of the balance of power is doomed to make many unnecessary mistakes that can result in mission failure.

    If you look at the USA as an example, we have two tribes:  The Tribe of the Rich (10 to 15%)  and the Tribe of the Rest of Us (90 to 85%).  Until the majority of The Tribe of the Rest of Us wake up to the reality of how the Tribe of the Rich are screwing us, nothing will change.  The members of the Tribe of the Rich understand this delicate and uneven political balance which is why they have been able to hold onto the power.  However, they may be losing their grip as it is becoming increasingly difficult for their tailors to continue to declare that the king is not indeed naked, and thus they they have tricked the rest of us with their propaganda–thus explaining my passion with educating the majority in regard to propaganda strategies that are wielded against us by the rich. – Liz

     

    Proclaim the Queen!

      Real Truth Telling: CounterSpin

      May 19, 2011 in Energy, Real Journalism

      CounterSpin (5/13/11-5/19/11)

      Listen: [mp3] [RealAudio not avalailable]
      This week on CounterSpin: What are renewables and why are media telling us so little about them? With energy prices rising, and a nuclear disaster still unfolding in Japan, it would seem to be the perfect time to talk about renewable energy sources, like solar, wind and geothermal. But this hasn’t been the case. Independent journalist Miranda Spencer talks about how the media dismiss alternative forms of energy that are safer, cleaner and cheaper, but apparently still less journalistically viable than petroleum, nuclear and coal.
      Also information on Joe Barton’s distortions; the real truth regarding who want the US to stay in Iraq–the US military; the low-down on Gingrich and his ideas; and more.
      Proclaim the Queen!

        The Cube Project- Eco Friendly Home

        May 16, 2011 in Energy, Environment

        Dr Mike Page from the University of Hertfordshirt takes you on a tour of the Cube, a 3x3x3m eco-home in which one person can live with a minimum impact on the environment. Shot by Allan MacDonald at the Edinburgh International Science Festival, April 2011. Please note: He forgot to mention the combination-microwave oven, largely because he left it in Hatfield.

        Proclaim the Queen!

          Yes you liars, tell us how we must have fossil fuel for another 50 years

          May 15, 2011 in Energy

          And we will tell YOU the story of Tocca da Casauria, Italy–a village in Italy WITH 2,824 people, not 50 years from now but today that is not only producing energy for its community, but an additional 30 percent more.

          READ THE ENTIRE STORY

          Ever wanted to have your rubbish collection bill reduced?

          Or have the cost of your children’s school meals cut?

          Or live in a place where you get cheap visits to the local health spa?

          There is one town in Italy where all this is possible, thanks to wind.

          The town is Tocco Da Casauria and it is being held up as an example of what is possible with renewable energy.

          Schools also benefit from the “windfall” profits.

          As well as getting money to help with building works, they get subsidies for meals.

          A two-course lunch at the local primary school costs less than a euro a day.

          And fancy soaking in the warm, bubbling, sulphurous waters of the local health spa?

          Prices there have been discounted as well thanks to an 11,000-euro subsidy from the town’s coffers.

          Mayor Riziero Zaccagnini says Tocco may be exceptional but there is a message for everyone.

          “There is a simple lesson here about sustainability,” he says.

          EVEN MORE AT A DEC 2, 2010 POST ON BBC NEWS

          Proclaim the Queen!

            Japan Saturday Update: Now they consider their actions

            April 23, 2011 in Energy

            The Wall Street Journal reports that rhe Japanese government’s nuclear safety agency said Saturday it has commissioned an investigation into the ability of the No. 1 reactor at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi to withstand further earthquakes in the wake of the March 11 disasters, amid concern that pouring water crucial to cool fuel rods into the reactor could conceivably weaken its structure.

            “We are checking this, but haven’t reached the conclusion that there are problems,” said Hidehiko Nishiyama, spokesman and deputy director-general for Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency, speaking at a regular briefing in the capital.  MORE

            ******************************************************************

            QUEEN’S COMMENT

            So what happens now?  Are they going to implement another solution without first considering the consequences and then weeks later decide to consider if perhaps the solution is creating even worse problems?

            The main point to never forget with the Japanese nuclear disaster is that it was nothing but idiocy, greed, lack of concern for the environment or the health of the community for even one nuclear power plant to ever have been built on Japan.

            They should have realized this on two accounts from day one: 1) the frequency of earthquakes and 2) the lack of available space to store the nuclear waste.  What were their long-term plans for that?  To ship it to China or the USA to endanger our citizens.

            ALL energy worldwide should be replaced with solar and wind.  It is an oxymoron, if not outright lie, to speak of ANY fossil fuel in terms of “clean energy.”

             

            Proclaim the Queen!

              Here is the message on energy: Just say no to fracking fossil fuel

              April 15, 2011 in Energy

              Methane-filled tap water.  Hydraulic fracturing is a controversial natural gas drilling process that often leaves the environment around it horribly polluted.

              But really the same can be said for the extraction of ANY FOSSIL FUEL.  Oil well drillings leave their slush pits of toxins where nothing can grow for years.  There there is the issue of what to do with all the waste from coal mining processes.  In December of 2008 the TVA Kingston plant had its holding pond of toxic coal slurry to overflow and flood thousands of acres with 1.4 billion gallons of toxic waste.  A day after the spill the authorities said it would take 3 to six weeks to clean up the mess.  A year later with over $600 million spent, they had just cleaned up 3% of that mess.

              Proclaim the Queen!

                LIVING OFF THE GRID IS EASIER THAN EVER BEFORE–We do not need corporate supplied nuclear power.

                March 27, 2011 in Energy

                Living Off the Grid

                Off-Grid reports on the people, technologies, events and influences throughout the global off-grid community. The Landbuddy section helps you find others to go off-grid with and the free classifieds are full of ads for off the grid real estate. The Off-Grid101 section is packed with basic information from the right kind of solar cooker to how to gather rainwater.

                With daily news stories and a busy forum, off-grid.net is an indispensible part of daily routine for many off-gridders.

                The brainchild of author and campaigner Nick Rosen, the site now has 75,000 visitors a month, mainly from the US and UK, and continues to expand.

                Off-Grid.net is an eclectic mix of practical advice, news from the on-grid world and issues rarely covered by the mainstream media.  It promotes the many enterprises that are working for a sustainable future. It campaigns on issues affecting people who live or work off-grid, including zoning/planning permission where we are calling for changes to allow people to receive special permission to set up off-grid homes in places which do not currently have residential permission.

                *************************************************************************

                1,000 Families in the small state of Maine live off the grid

                Read the full story for photos and details about their alternative power setups: “Living off-grid – 1,000 Maine Families” in the Bangor Daily News.

                When Kim and her husband, Mike, moved into their home in the woods outside Fort Kent nine years ago, the nearest power line was several miles away. Since connecting to the grid can cost $45,000 to $70,000 per mile, alternative energy sources were their only option. But Kim is quick to say they did not start out with the amount of available power they now have. Slowly, the couple built up their wind and solar power and storage systems to the point where they no longer have to wait for sunny and windy days to vacuum or watch television or use the shower with remote control music, water jets and a foot massage.

                Patty Hill of Eagle Lake runs her entire home with solar power and is adding wind power. Two new free-standing Skystream wind turbines were erected in August and are waiting for an inverter before going on-line. “I’m used to planning my life around my electric consumption,” Hill said. “When the batteries run down I turn the vacuum off — it’s good to have that excuse.” But, she said, “I don’t feel you should struggle just because you have alternative power. I have light bulbs, I take cozy, hot showers, watch television and use my computer. Hill readily admits entering into the world of alternative power knowing little about it — it was her husband’s idea.

                *********************************************************************

                FALLING COSTS FOR INSTALLING SOLAR

                While installation costs for the solar panels, wind turbines, converters and batteries needed to power up an off-grid home were prohibitively expensive a few years back, improved technology and ramped up production has driven down costs significantly.

                According to Low Impact Living (http://www.lowimpactliving.com/), installation costs have fallen by more than 80 per cent over 20 years.

                Proclaim the Queen!

                  It’s not like there haven’t been truth-tellers about Nuclear Energy from its inception

                  March 26, 2011 in Energy, Environment

                  Here in the June 7, 1976 Sarasota Herald Tribune

                  U.S. Urged to speed advances in Nuclear Power, Technology

                  The recommendations in this article came from The Atlantic Council of the United States [a Washington think tank which include many former members in Obama's administration. Susan Rice and James L. Jones to name two off the top of my head.  Of course they were not members at the time of this article in 1976.
                  "The United States should accelerate the development of nuclear power to help assure the non-Communist world of independent energy alternatives. . . Nuclear power has been demonstrated to be safe and not environmentally harmful. . . .adequate waste management techniques could be found and a lack of demonstrated policy to handle radioactive wastes continues to be an unnecessary problem to acceptance of nuclear power."  [Queen:  In other words, we'll worry about radioactive wastes after we create it.]

                  The last two paragraphs of this article was devoted to the truthtellers.

                  This new study [from the Atlantic Council] is in direct conflict with one issued a month ago by another Washington based private group:  Worldwatch Institute* Their report said nuclear power was such a threat to safety, peace and sound economy that it may never develop int the worldwide energy source once envisioned.  Worldwatch, a nonprofit group chaired by Orville Freeman, former Agriculture Secretary, painted a pessimistic picture of nuclear power.  It said there were better ways, such as solar and wind energy, to fill the world’s needs. [Remember this was written in 1976--35 years ago!]

                  Here is one from this century

                  Let’s ask again:  Why not Solar Power

                  _______________________________________________

                  * Founded in 1974 by farmer and economist Lester Brown, Worldwatch was the first independent research institute devoted to the analysis of global environmental concerns. Worldwatch quickly became recognized by opinion leaders around the world for its accessible, fact-based analysis of critical global issues. Now under the leadership of renewable energy expert Christopher Flavin, Worldwatch develops innovative solutions to intractable problems, emphasizing a blend of government leadership, private sector enterprise, and citizen action that can make a sustainable future a reality.

                  Proclaim the Queen!

                    More distressing News from Japan

                    March 26, 2011 in Energy, Environment, World News

                    Now we learn from MSNBC (at 5PM Friday) that the radioactive water could make the recovery process at the plant impossible. Some reports suggested the workers had been exposed to deadly levels of full-body gamma radiation.

                    ***************************************************************************

                    QUEEN’S COMMENTS

                    A seemingly thoughtful article on the topic is titled “Lifting the Veil of Nuclear Catastrophe” written by Keith Harmon Snow.  The article made many very interesting points.  Among other things, unlike Ann Coulter, he believes that the situation is apocalyptic and getting worse–that this is one of the most serious challenges humanity has ever faced.

                    NOTE ON THE AUTHOR:  Keith Harmon Snow is an independent journalist, war correspondent and photographer. He has also worked as a genocide investigator and consultant to the United Nations and other international bodies. He has won three Project Censored awards for his Central Africa reportage, is a member of the Asiana Press Agency (www.Asiana-Press-Agency.com), and he also recently worked in Afghanistan. Snow has worked in varying capacities in some 16 countries in Asia, Latin America and Europe, and 14 countries in Africa. A human rights investigator [formerly] working with Genocide Watch and Survivor’s Rights International, he attended the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda, and has testified at a congressional hearing in Washington, D.C.”

                    ************************************************************************

                    A few excerpts from Snow’s article.

                    Intentional efforts to downplay or dismiss this catastrophe reveal the immaturity of western civilization and some of our most acute human pathologies, including our worship of technology and our psychopathology of denial. The widespread distortion and cover-ups to protect private profits, national and corporate interests, to fool and betray the people, are unacceptable. Here are some of the deeper whats and whys and hows — some technical issues and the kinds of questions people need to ask — about the nuclear apocalypse unfolding on planet earth. Prayers are not enough. It’s time to question everything, to put politics aside, to take personal action to halt nuclear expansion and defend ourselves from this industrial juggernaut.

                    I repeat, there was and will *not* be any significant release of radioactivity from the damaged Japanese reactors,” wrote Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Dr. Joseph Oehmen on March 13. “By ‘significant’ I mean a level of radiation of more than what you would receive on — say — a long distance flight, or drinking a glass of beer that comes from certain areas with high levels of natural background radiation.” So begins a recent U.S. business sector article titled You Can Stop Worrying About A Radiation Disaster in Japan — Here’s Why, published four days after the earthquake struck in Japan. It has already proved false. Properly understood for what it is — a childish, myopic, arrogant attempt to belittle the truth and influence public opinion — the article provides an apt example of the rampant industry disinformation that is sweeping aside rational and compassionate and precautionary assessments with irrational jingoism, simplistic emotional appeals, and wrong-headed thinking. The post went viral and was republished widely.

                    The Nuclear Industry has A LONG HISTORY OF DECEPTION

                    Like the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Japanese officials have a long history of covering up ugly nuclear realities. In a recent WikiLeaks diplomatic cable, politician Taro Kono, a high-profile member of Japan’s lower house, told U.S. diplomats that the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (MITI) — the Japanese government department responsible for nuclear energy — has been “covering up nuclear accidents and obscuring the true costs and problems associated with the nuclear industry.” In 2002 “the chairman and four executives of TEPCO, the company that owns the stricken Fukushima plant, resigned after reports that safety records were falsified.”

                    Such singular but remarkable events follow a pattern of wholesale U.S. cover-ups that define the industry as secretive and criminal, and they involve shoddy equipment, human incompetence, unsafe designs, inadequate safety measures, and economic decisions that have occurred since the very beginning of Japan’s nuclear power era — which itself was born out of the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with U.S.-made weapons of mass destruction.

                    READ THE COMPLETE ARTICLE AND THEN TRY TO HAVE A RESTFUL SLEEP TONIGHT

                    Proclaim the Queen!