You are browsing the archive for 2012 Elections.

Ron Paul with his investments in mining companies is the biggest hypocrite of them all

February 5, 2012 in 2012 Elections

Ron Paul – in office for 15 years  With a net worth of  $5,064,000 in 2009

To listen to some Ron Paul fans, one would think that he is a kind old country doctor in line right after Jesus and  the Virgin Mary. “Taint so” folks.  Ron Paul is no different from the 44% of our Congress who are Wall Street multimillionaires.  Like them, he too has gotten rich off the lives of workers from the 99%–not only in the USA, but the world.  But don’t take my word for it.  Look up Ron Paul and his Wall Street investment in Open Secrets.

Ron Paul increased his wealth from $3,930,000 in 2008 to $5,064,000 in 2009 – over a million dollars richer.  Yep, Saint Ron Paul made over a million bucks in the Wall Street Casino at a time when millions of Americans were losing their jobs and homes.  Ron Paul is no different from any other greedy millionaire Wall Street shystet that we have “representing” us in Congress.

In fact, I think that Paul may be the biggest hypocrite of all.  He doesn’t vote for trade agreements and the rails against the war on drugs, but he profits from both of them.

Do you think Ron Paul cares about people?  Think again.  If he did, he would not invest in corporations known for murdering their workers.  Mr. Paul, a millionaire at least five times over, has several million of his assets invested in numerous mining corporations including three of the worst mining corporations in the world: Anglogold Ashanti Ltd $250,001 to $500,000 According to Forbes AngloGold Ashanti was accused in 2007 in Colombia for “murders of trade union and community leaders who opposed the company’s activities in the region”.

Ron Paul makes at least part of his millions off the backs of child labor and mining companies who murder leaders who try to organize workers for decent working conditions.

___________________________________

Here is an excerpt from a letter that was sent  on Jan 30, 2012, to M. Amadou Cisse, Ministere des Mines in Mali.

“.  .  .  The Malian government and the International Labor Organization have estimated that there are approximately 100,000 to 200,000 individuals who work in artisanal gold mines in Mali, among whom an estimated 20,000 to 40,000 are children. Many of these children perform hazardous child labor, in contravention of Malian labor law. While artisanal mining represents an important source of income and livelihood for adults, there are serious health risks for children who dig pits, work underground, carry, pan, and crush ore, and use mercury to extract gold. As you know, the use of mercury in mining is highly toxic, particularly to children. Our research found that children in Mali start working as young as six years old. Many child laborers are denied an education or drop out of school. Some children come to the mines without their parents and suffer economic or sexual exploitation. .. .”  Source

Proclaim the Queen!

    When it comes to myth-making the Romans and Greeks have nothing on American politics

    February 4, 2012 in 2012 Elections

    Most Americans who would scoff at the notion of Neptune nonetheless buy the myth that the leadership of the Democrat Party is different from the leadership Republican Party.  The truth is that the leadership of BOTH parties are plutocrats and they all have a disdain–not only for the poor, but also the middle class.

    ________________________________________________________

    We are a democracy with free elections and year after year we choose to be governed by a plutocracy that supports an outright police state as our form of government.  One of the great ironies of the Republican myth makers is that they have us convinced that the Europe of today is the Europe of three hundred years ago.  The truth is that most European nations are far more democratic than the USA.  The USA is looking more and more like a large banana republic ruled not by one, but several right-wing dictators.

    It never ceases to amaze me–year after year.  But i have to admit that until the end of 2007 I was a member of the duped.  I believed in the two-party system.  I thoroughly bought into the polarized notion of Democrats and Republicans.  I was a member of the club called “Democrats”.  I was sure, although looking back, I cannot give you one rational reason why, the Democrats were the ones for the working people.  They were the ones against the war.  (Really?  Truman is the one who ordered the atomic bomb to be dropped on Hiroshima.  Kennedy got us into Vietnam and Johnson kept us there.)

    Perhaps it was the other face of Lyndon Johnson–his visions of the great society that I saw during my formative years as a young adult that made such a lasting impression on me.  There was Medicare and the passage of the Civil Rights Act in 1964–which by the way, even with MLK’s efforts and legacy–would never have passed Congress without Johnson’s talent for marching up the hill and banging heads together.

    In 2006 the American people elected a Democrat majority in both houses on the mandate to end the war in Iraq and bring all the troops home by the end of 2008.  And what did this Democrat majority in both houses do?  They continued to approve George Bush’s unfunded allocations for war, just like the Republican majority before them.  Then, before they had even been in office a year, this Democrat majority in both houses voted not to end the war but to send 100,000 more troops to Iraq!  That was an outrage and a direct insult to the majority of Americans who had elected them.

    What else did this Democrat majority do?  They voted to defund and thus bankrupt ACORN–an  organization whose only crime was to empower poor people by registering them to vote.  Their “proof” of ACORN’s “wrong doing”?  it was all based on a heavily doctored video tape created by a know-right-wing operative and utter jerk by the name of James O’Keefe.  But this Democrat majority Congress did n’t stop there. They passed a healthcare bill that helps Americans who work for a corporation that at least supplements workers health insurance and forces the 50 million Americans who can’t afford health care to purchase it from a Wall Street corporation.

    Then as a parting gift to the rich, just before a Republican majority in the House took over in January of 2011, this Democrat majority voted to extend the Bush tax cuts.  Eight years was not enough time to show them that tax cuts for the rich don’t do a damn thing for the economy but make it worse?  Hell no.  These people know that tax cuts for the rich don’t work for the majority of our nation, but they don’t give a damn because they belong to the 1% club.

    _____________________________________________________

    We are a nation of head bangers who keep voting for the same people year after year and wondering why things don’t change.  Harry Reid has been in the Senate for 25 years.  Mitch McConnell has been in the Senator for 27 years.  Carl Levin has been in the Senate for 32 years.  John Boehner has been in the House for 21 years.  James Sensenbrenner has been in the House for 32 years.  John Kerry has been in the Senate for 27 years.

    _____________________________________________________

    If you want a USA that is representative of the majority, you are:

    1. Going to have to let go the myth that a Democrat is that different from a Republican.

    2. Stop voting for the same bastards year in and year out.

    Yes, it really is that simple.  and if you don’t like the choices, then run for office yourself or draft your neighbor.

    Proclaim the Queen!

      If Twitter and Popularity are to be the Weathervane, then Kim Kardashian will be president.

      February 2, 2012 in 2012 Elections

      Yesterday I reported on The Twitter popularity of Candidates. Today I decided to investigate other candidates and pundits and their corresponding twitter popularity

      This is what I found:

      President Obama  https://twitter.com/#!/barackobama is the champion of the politicians with over 12 million followers:  12, 276, 394

      But perhaps to put the president’s 12, 276, 394 into perspective.  We might note that Kim Kardashian beats him by almost 700,000 followers.  Ms. Kardashian has 12, 928,641 twitter followers.  http://twitter.com/kimkardashian.  Does that mean that she should be our next president?

      _____________________________________________________________________

      Newt Gingrich https://twitter.com/#!/newtgingrich has 1,433,224 followers

      Sarah Palin https://twitter.com/#!/sarahpalin has 728, 895 followers

      Jon Stewart http://twitter.com/thedailyshow  has 622, 147 followers.

      Mitt Romney https://twitter.com/#!/mittromney has 313, 472 followers (half as many as Palin and more than four times less than Gingrich.

      Speaker Boehner http://twitter.com/speakerboehner has 272,846 followers.

      Ron Paul  http://twitter.com/ronpaul   has 223, 309 followers

      Nancy Pelosi http://twitter.com/nancypelosi has 152, 676 followers.

      Bill O’Reilly http://twitter.com/oreillyfactor has 133,288 followers.

      Bernie Sanders  http://twitter.com/senatorsanders has 89,045 followers

      Eric Cantor  http://twitter.com/EricCantor has 58,054 followers.

      Rachel Maddow  http://twitter.com/maddowblog has 55,300 followers

      Rick Perry https://twitter.com/#!/teamrickperry has 25,190 followers

      Alan Grayson http://twitter.com/alangrayson  has 24,404 followers

      Harry Reid http://twitter.com/HarryReid has 7,553 followers

      Chris Matthews http://twitter.com/MSNBC_CMatthews has 6,003 followers.

      Green Party USA http://twitter.com/gpus has 2,462 followers

      Jill Stein http://twitter.com/jillstein2012   has 1,866 followers

      Justice Party USA  http://twitter.com/justicepartyusa has 461 followers

      It’s interesting to see who these people follow as well.  While most of them follow several hundred people, there are some such as Eric Cantor, who only follow 20 people—what does that say about them?

      Proclaim the Queen!

        Newt has more than four times as many followers on Twitter than Romney

        January 31, 2012 in 2012 Elections

        I think this may significant in terms of their audience.

        Romney has 306,482Twitter followers.   https://twitter.com/#!/mittromney

        Newt has 1,431,242 followers.  https://twitter.com/#!/newtgingrich

        That’s a huge difference.

        It could say that Newt’s audience is more computer savvy.

        It could say that Newt’s audience is younger than Romney’s audience.

        It could say that Newt has a larger national audience than Romney–in spite of the corporate network spin.

        It most likely says that it “ain’t” over yet and we have months ahead of us before the fat lady sings.

        Proclaim the Queen!

          The 2012 slogan from the GOP establishment: I’ve made a ton of money. You got a problem with that?

          January 31, 2012 in 2012 Elections

          The “Party of Against” have finally come the full circle:  Now they are against themselves.

          Eugene Robinson pointed out that the GOP has not one but two huge problems:  One is named “Newt” and the other one is named “Mitt.”

          ” . . .When the empire strikes back, it hits hard. The Republican establishment is deploying every weapon and every soldier—even Bob Dole—in an increasingly desperate attempt to pulverize the Newt Gingrich rebellion. Eventually, the shock-and-awe campaign may work.

          But then what? In the establishment’s best-case scenario, the party is left with Mitt Romney, a candidate whose core message, as far as I can tell, seems to be: “Yes, I made a ton of money. You got a problem with that?” . . .”

          Read the complete article at Truth Dig

          The GOP have traded Gingrich for the guy with the message they hope will win.  Good luck!  They need to wake up and take a good long look at Main Street and how angry the people are.

          Proclaim the Queen!

            People are “shocked” that Freddie Mac leaders bet against homeowners?

            January 30, 2012 in 2012 Elections

            They should be more shocked that people they elect to Congress place Wall Street bets agains their constituents.

             NPR reports that:
            ” Freddie Mac, a taxpayer-owned mortgage company, is supposed to make homeownership easier. One thing that makes owning a home more affordable is getting a cheaper mortgage.

            But Freddie Mac has invested billions of dollars betting that U.S. homeowners won’t be able to refinance their mortgages at today’s lower rates, according to an investigation by NPR and ProPublica, an independent, non-profit newsroom.

            These investments, while legal, raise concerns about a conflict of interest within Freddie Mac.

            “We were actually shocked they did this,” says Scott Simon, who heads the mortgage-backed securities team at the giant bond trading and investment firm called PIMCO. “It seemed so out of line with their mission, out of line with what Congress wanted them to do.”

            ____________________________________________________________

            ILWQ

            “. . .Out of line with what Congress wanted them to do?”  NPR must be kidding!  Members of Congress care so little about the people of the USA that they place bets with the Wall Street Casino against the people.

             Someone needs to educate these people on the facts of life about members of Congress:  Many of them, such as Eric Cantor,  place bets against the American people.

             Eric Cantor, the Republican Whip in the House of Representatives, bought up to $15,000 in shares of ProShares Trust Ultrashort 20+ Year Treasury ETF in December of 2009, according to his 2009 financial disclosure statement. The exchange-traded fund takes a short position in long-dated government bonds. In effect, it is a bet against U.S. government bonds—and perhaps on inflation in the future.” [Source]

            But if you think that betting against the USA is limited to Republicans like Cantor, you are wrong. Democrats do it too.  According to a May 3, 2010 article in the  WSJ,  ” . .  . investment accounts of 13 members of Congress or their spouses show bearish bets made in 2008 via exchange-traded funds—portfolios that trade like stocks and mirror an index. These funds were leveraged; they used derivatives and other techniques to magnify the daily moves of the index they track.” 

            THEY ALL MUST GO IN 2012!

            NPR writes about “conflict of interest” in Freddie Mac?  If they wrote about news that mattered, they would be writing about the conflict of interest in both houses of US Congress that is demonstrated daily.  The people need to wake up t the fact that NPR has the same corporate sponsors that mainstream media does.  The only reason they are hitting on Freddie Mac is because of Gingrich’s association with it.  The establishment want Romney to run and they are doing everything they can to push him.

            Congress placing Wall Street bets  against the people is not a new story.  I wrote about it over six months ago.  http://my.firedoglake.com/iflizwerequeen/2011/07/09/members-of-congress-and-their-spouses-place-wall-street-bets-against-the-usa/

            Proclaim the Queen!

              The biggest whopper Mitt Romney told: “I didn’t inherit my wealth.”

              January 28, 2012 in 2012 Elections

              Now while Mitt’s father could have stood up before an audience and honestly made the claim:  ”I didn’t inherit my wealth.”  The same is not true for Mitt.  He did inherit a large foundation of wealth.  As the son of a multimillionaire, Mitt Romney was born with not a silver, but a golden spoon in his mouth.   George W Romney’s estimated net worth was 600 million dollars when he died.  It is said that he left each of his children over 100 million dollars. Furthermore, Mitt’s father was already a multimillionaire by the time Mitt was born. Mitt has never in his life lacked for any material thing–never.  He has no conception whatsoever of the term “doing without.”  (Unless you wanted to make a case for doing without winning an election.)

              _____________________________________________

              MORE ABOUT GEORGE THE FATHER ROMNEY

              Mitt’s grandparents  were polygamous Mormons who fled the United States with their children due to the federal government’s opposition to polygamy. Mitt’s father was born in 1907 in the Mexican state of Chihuahua.

              Later, in the United States, George the father Romney grew up in humble circumstances.  The family subsisted with other Mormon refugees on government relief in El Paso, Texas. (Good thing for them that Newt or Mitt or Ron Paul weren’t running the country.)   A few months later they moved to Los Angeles, California where Gaskell Romney worked as a carpenter. In kindergarten, other children mocked George Romney’s national origin by calling him “Mex”.  George started working in wheat and sugar beet fields at the age of eleven and was the valedictorian at his grammar school graduation in 1921.

              The family later moved to Salt Lake City where George became a skilled lath and plaster worker.  In October of 1926 he had saved enough to fund himself as a Mormon missionary and he sailed to Great Britain to preach in a Glasgow, Scotland slum.  The abject poverty and hopelessness he saw there affected him greatly but he was not effective in converting people.  He also suffered a crisis of faith.  In February of 1927, he was shifted to Edinburgh where he was more successful. Romney often said that his missionary time (proselytizing the Mormon religion from soap boxes in Hyde Park and from a platform at Trafalgar Square) had meant more for developing his gives for debate and sales than any other experience.

              Visionary is a word that would fit George Romney, but many of  his visions would make the hair of the current mob running the Republican Party stand on end.

              In 1939 he moved to Detroit and joined the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, where he served as the chief spokesperson for the automobile industry during World War II and headed a cooperative arrangement in which companies could share production improvements.

              In 1948 he joined Nash-Kelvinator and became chairman and CEO of its successor, American Motors Corporation in 1954. Romney turned around the struggling firm by focusing all efforts on the compact Rambler car. Romney mocked the products of the “Big Three” automakers as “gas-guzzling dinosaurs” and became one of the first high-profile, media-savvy business executives.

              He took office as governor of Michigan in 1963 when Mitt was 15. He was re-elected by increasingly large margins in 1964 and 1966. Romney worked to overhaul the state’s financial and revenue structure, culminating in Michigan’s first state income tax, and greatly expanded the size of state government. Romney was a strong supporter of the American Civil Rights Movement. He briefly represented moderate Republicans against conservative Republican Barry Goldwater during the 1964 U.S. presidential election. He requested the intervention of federal troops during the 1967 Detroit riot.

              _______________________________________________

              It may have been telling the truth that eventually destroyed George Romney’s chances at the highest office in the land.  Perhaps that explains his son’s aversion to the truth today.

              Romney was a candidate for the Republican nomination for President of the United States in 1968. He was initially a front-runner but then he proved an ineffective campaigner at the national level. After a mid-1967 remark explaining that his earlier support for the Vietnam War  had been due to a “brainwashing” by U.S. military and diplomatic officials in Vietnam, Romney fell behind Richard Nixon in the polls.  (This was exactly what they did and what they continue to do today with visiting officials to war zones–Generals and other military officials and members of the diplomatic corp  carefully monitor and control what visiting dignitaries are allowed to see in order to brainwash them in favor of war.  Romney was doing nothing but telling the truth.)

              But George Romney broke all kinds of Republican rules with that statement about being brainwashed by the military.

              1. Never criticize the U.S. Military or diplomatic officials.

              2. Certainly never accuse them of doing what the enemy does–brainwashing (or torturing prisoners–although torture has become acceptable in some circles).

              3. If you speak against war, you are an anti-American Pinko

              Proclaim the Queen!

                Just because you are a Latino, doesn’t mean you are a Latino . .

                January 27, 2012 in 2012 Elections

                Ask Marc Rubio

                No Somos Rubios.

                How quickly some forget their roots.  SHAME ON Marco Rubio!

                Marco Rubio: “I do not, and will not ever support blanket legalization of illegal immigrants. . .”

                I wonder where Mr Rubio thinks that thousands of Cubans would be today if they weren’t the beneficiaries of what amounted to not only blanket legalization but over a billion dollars to these immigrants in government help? His parents emigrated to the USA in 1956 and became naturalized citizens. They were among the lucky ones who got out early.  But if “exceptions to the immigration laws” had not been made for thousands of Cubans, they and their descendants would not be living in the USA today.

                The United States Congress passed the Cuban Adjustment Act in 1966. The Cuban Refugee Program provided more than $1.3 billion (approximately $4 billion in today’s dollars) of direct financial assistance. They also were eligible for public assistance, Medicare, free English classes, scholarships  and low-interest college  loans.   Some banks even pioneered loans for exiles who did not have collateral or credit but received help in getting a business loan. These loans enabled many Cuban Americans to secure funds and start up their own businesses.

                Proclaim the Queen!

                  Is this America Exceptionalism? The Nazis said the USA was their inspiration.

                  January 27, 2012 in 2012 Elections

                  When Nazi administrators went on trial for war crimes in Nuremberg after World War II,  they justified the mass sterilizations (over 450,000 in less than a decade) by citing the United States as their inspiration. The Nazis had claimed American eugenicists inspired and supported Hitler’s racial purification laws, and failed to understand the connection between those policies and the eventual genocide of the Holocaust.    [Source]

                   

                  Now why would the Nazis make such a claim?

                  In 1935, all but 11 states either had laws [////] or laws pending | that legalized sterilization (without consent).

                  “The Immigration Restriction League (founded in 1894) was the first American entity associated officially with eugenics. The League sought to bar what it considered dysgenic members of certain races from entering America and diluting what it saw as the superior American racial stock through procreation. They lobbied for a literacy test for immigrants, based on the belief that literacy rates were low among “inferior races”. Literacy test bills were vetoed by Presidents in 1897, 1913 and 1915; eventually, President Wilson’s second veto was overruled by Congress in 1917. Membership in the League included: A. Lawrence Lowell, president of Harvard, William DeWitt Hyde, president of Bowdoin College, James T. Young, director of Wharton School and David Starr Jordan, president of Stanford University. The League allied themselves with the American Breeder’s Association to gain influence and further its goals and in 1909 established a eugenics committee chaired by David Starr Jordan with members Charles Davenport, Alexander Graham Bell, Vernon Kellogg, Luther Burbank, William Earnest Castle, Adolf Meyer, H. J. Webber and Friedrich Woods.  The ABA’s immigration legislation committee, formed in 1911 and headed by League’s founder Prescott F. Hall, formalized the committee’s already strong relationship with the Immigration Restriction League.”

                  _______________________________________________

                  in 2012, they ALL must go.

                  Democrats and Republicans.

                  Proclaim the Queen!

                    Who was the biggest liar last night? Gingrich or Romney?

                    January 27, 2012 in 2012 Elections

                    Romney wins by a landslide for having told the most whoppers.  In other words, Romney is the biggest liar of them all by virtue of sheer volume.

                    - Romney lied about not voting for a Democrat if there was a Republican on the ballot — He voted for Paul Tsongas in a Democratic primary in 1992 in the same election where President George H.W. Bush faced Pat Buchanan. [SOURCE WIKI]

                    - He lied about telling us that he never said  his Massachusetts health care plan was a model for the nation — the truth is that he’s often said it was.

                    - Romney claims that his great personal wealth is an asset to help America but he is not investing in America.  He has millions in offshore tax havens.  Such tax havens cost American taxpayers about $100 billion a year. [Source]

                    - Romney lied about saying that he would not kick all the illegal immigrants out of the country. He has more than once, even during this debate season, said that if he were elected that he not only would he kick them out, he would veto the Dream Act.

                    - Romney once again falsely accused Obama of saying “nothing” about the Palestinians launching rockets into Israel during a 2009 speech to the United Nations. [Here is a quote from Obama's 2009 address to the United Nations:  "We must remember that the greatest price of this conflict is not paid by us. It’s not paid by politicians. It’s paid by the Israeli girl in Sderot who closes her eyes in fear that a rocket will take her life in the middle of the night. It’s paid for by the Palestinian boy in Gaza who has no clean water and no country to call his own."]

                    - Romney does not give a rat’s ass about the Latinos.  He even tried to make it sound like his father was a Mexican last night LOL.  Romney’s father was born in Chihuahua Mexico in 1907, the son of  USA Mormon missionaries.

                    Note: In my opinion, no candidate can say out of one side of his mouth that he is for the Latino community and then out of the other side of his mouth say that he would veto the Dream Act if he were president.  Under the Dream Act,  young undocumented immigrants who have lived most of their lives in the United States and graduate from U.S. high schools would be eligible for a conditional six-year “path to citizenship” if they earn a college degree or serve two years in the military.  Romney has said that he would veto this bill .

                    Another important point that the latinos of Florida especially should understand is that people migrate to other countries illegally under duress and in a matter of life and death for one of three main reasons:  1) war and/or the threat of a dictator such as Castro; 2) Unfair trade agreements that push people off their land such as NAFTA an unfair trade agreement that decimated the mexican corn farmers who could not compete with the heavily subsidized US agribusinesses such as ADM and Cargill; 3) Crop failure because of climate change.  People should not be castigated for trying to survive.

                    ________________________________________

                    Thus, when it comes to volume, Romney wins.  However, if the lie(s) are to be measured by magnitude + the depth of psychopathic calculation and intent to deliberately deceive victims,  then Gingrich may hold the record for his lie that he balanced the budget

                    Yes Gingrich, with the assistance of a Republican Congress and Bill Clinton did balance the budget–on the backs of the working people of the USA.  They “balanced” the budget by dipping into Social Security funds.  [More details of that here.]

                    Of course, even Ron Paul left off the fact that while the majority of the working class pay Social Security tax on 100% of their income, the investor class don’t pay a dime of Social Security tax on amounts above $106,000 that they earn.

                    ________________________________________________

                    Speaking of Mitt’s Pseudo Latino Father, Newt gets a black mark for missed opportunity last night. Newt Gingrich is tying the wrong person to Saul Alinsky in his bizarre attacks on Barack Obama. BuzzFeed found old pictures of George Romney meeting with Saul Alinsky to discuss the grievances of the urban black poor.  [By the way, Saul Alinsky’s “crime” is helping the poor to organized their communities. Saul Alinsky has been compared to Thomas Paine as being “one of the great American leaders of the nonsocialist left.”   MORE

                    Photos of Willard’s dad fraternizing with Saul Alinsky.

                    _________________________________________

                    One thing is certain:  the tales of Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox pale in comparison to the tales told on the campaign trail.

                    Proclaim the Queen!