Underemployment is at 20% and Republicans threatened to filibuster a jobs bill?
February 23, 2010 in 2009 The REAL Big Brother, 2011 Blue Dog Pasture, 2011 Republican Pasture, Class War
Rather than lower the amount of the recent jobs bill that the Senate passed yesterday with the votes of five Republican Senators, I think the Democrats should have increased the proposed funding of the jobs bill. Our Senate had difficulty voting for a $15 billlion dollar jobs bill for ordinary Americans and the Senate Blue Dogs and Republicans practically fell all over themselves to hand over $800 trillion for the Bush Administration/Hank Paulson/Goldman Sachs heist just before George packed his suitcases last fall? How’s that for twisted priorities?
I say LET THE REPUBLICANS FILIBUSTER A JOBS BILL IN THIS ECONOMY AND SEE HOW FAR THEY GET AT THE POLLS IN NOVEMBER.
But there is a reason why the Democrats don’t do this. The truth is that the Senate Democrats and the Republicans belong to the same club. They have been working like a pair of grifters to con the American people for at least 25 years. They take turns being the good cop and the bad cop. This year it’s the fashion to be a Democrat, next year it will the Republicans, a few years down the line the Democrats will be in favor again, etc. The Democrats need the Republicans and the Republicans need the Democrats.
God forbid that a real army of Independents with intelligence and knowledge of their games should rise up against them. The Democrats and Republicans are joined at the hip to keep the Independent “rifraff” from seriously competing with them and forcing them to discuss real issues that really do matter to Americans. They officially welded themselves together in 1987 when they kicked the Women League of Voters out and decided that the two parties themselves would run the debates and decide what the topics of discussion would be and in fact who could even participate in the debates. Talk about putting the fox in the hen house. In 1987 they established the Commission on Presidential Debates
In 1988, the League of Women Voters withdrew its sponsorship of the presidential debates after the George H.W. Bush and Michael Dukakis campaigns secretly agreed to a “memorandum of understanding” that would decide which candidates could participate in the debates, which individuals would be panelists (and therefore able to ask questions), and the height of the podiums. The League rejected the demands and released a statement saying that they were withdrawing support for the debates because “the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter.
*In 1998, former CBS news anchor Walter Cronkite wrote, “The debates are part of the unconscionable fraud that our political campaigns have become . . . the candidates participate only with the guarantee of a format that defies meaningful discourse.” It is a testament to the state of mainstream journalism that leading news anchors happily agree to participate in these farces. It’s great PR exposure, after all. SOURCE
***************************************************************
*An interesting and disturbing note: A couple of months ago I used the WIKI source for another post that I wrote about the CPD. Today I returned to WIKI and I see that their original reference with the quote from Walter Cronkite has been scrubbed off the WIKI site. I had to look elsewhere on the Internet to find it so I could post it here. In addition, the WIKI article has been shortened considerably.




